Apple pie, ball and YouTube. It doesn’t get many some-more rational than that.

If we were asked to name a media code many compared with creation rational films, chances are you’d contend “Disney.”

Step aside Mickey. YouTube’s in town, and during slightest in a “violence” category, it’s far some-more family accessible than anything on television, according to researchers from Indiana University.

“Compared to television, a commission of YouTube videos that enclose assault is many lower,” a researchers says, as reported by Harvard University’s Joan Shorenstein Center.

Only 13 percent of a 2,400 YouTube videos complicated contained violence, compared to a whopping 70 percent for primary time radio shows – “a turn that has stay roughly consistent for decades” –  the investigate notes.

More than half of a YouTube assault occurred in usually 1.3 percent of a videos, that tended to arrangement scenes from video games.

One probable explanation: Users who beget calm for YouTube can’t means a income it takes to furnish scenes of violence. Or it could be that opposite values aspect when people furnish for YouTube than when “corporates” furnish for TV, Shorenstein notes.

“It is transparent from this investigate that when prolongation is a shortcoming of a masses rather than in a hands of a few, assault becomes a many scarcer commodity,” a researchers say. “Moreover, when assault is broached, it is generally reduction glamorized and reduction trivialized.”

The investigate initial seemed in a Journal of Communication (subscription required) final fall. Shorenstein published a examination a few weeks ago.

I have nonetheless to endorse this though indications are that increasingly, husbands are branch to their wives on Friday nights and saying, “Hey honey, whadya contend we stay in tonight with a kids and watch cats on skateboards.”

Photo: Scott Bauer, USDA ARS around Wikimedia.